Discover reviews on "zillaslab semibold woff" based on Reddit discussions and experiences.
Last updated: September 3, 2024 at 07:08 PM
Summarizing Reddit Comments on "ZillaSlab SemiBold woff"
ZillaSlab SemiBold woff
Users discussed various aspects related to font, site performance, errors in filenames, indexers, documentation, and serving static files. Here is a summary:
ZillaSlab Font:
- The Zilla Slab font was found to be functioning correctly in FontForge with no issues reported.
- Users compared it with other fonts like Linotype Helvetica Roman and Noto Sans in terms of total glyphs.
Site Performance:
Compilation Error:
- There was a discussion about a single quote in a filename causing issues in compilation, with a query about the compiler's response.
Indexers:
- Recommendations were given to try adding the Sickbeard indexer and using a lower timeout if using free indexers.
- Users shared tips for setting up the NZBhydra and checked for spelling errors like "nzbhyrda".
Documentation:
- Advice was shared on generating documentation using
cargo doc --open
and including module level documentation to get proper documentation.
- Advice was shared on generating documentation using
-
- Users discussed potential issues with multiple
src
in the @font-face declaration and shared a working example.
- Users discussed potential issues with multiple
Serving Static Files:
- WhiteNoise was suggested for serving static files with a caution against using buckets for static content.
Other Comments:
- Miscellaneous comments included feedback on the post quality, suggestions for section titles, questions about Fruition and Super, comparisons with Notion for landing pages, and recommendations on using CDN caching for static files.
This summary captures the diverse discussions related to ZillaSlab SemiBold woff, covering font specifics, site performance, file errors, indexers, documentation, @font-face declaration, serving static files, and other related topics shared on Reddit.