Comparison of Coding Assistant Tools

Cursor

• Description: Originally created as an answer to "what if ChatGPT, but without copy/paste."
• Features:
  • Works as a plugin/extension for Jetbrains and VSCode IDEs.
  • Codebase understanding similar to Cursor and scans the entire codebase.
  • Full multi-file support for editing and creating multiple files from a single prompt.
  • Vocal support for making changes.
  • "Send to Codebuddy" for webpages.
  • Generates better quality code due to multi-stage editing flow.
• Pricing: Offers a free version and a pro version.
• User Feedback:
  • Users appreciate its context understanding features.
  • User Quote: "Cursor truly lives up to the hype."

Supermaven

• Description: A coding assistant tool.
• Features: Offers inline completions.
• Pricing: Costs $10.
• User Feedback: Users find it to be part of a great coding combo when used with IntelliJ.

ChatGPT

• Description: A tool used for generating scripts and API calls.
• Feedback: Useful for its generation capabilities but struggles with codebase interactions.

Codebuddy

• Description: An AI assistant tool.
• Features:
  • Offers voice support, full multi-file support, codebase understanding, and better quality code output.
  • Works with popular IDEs like Jetbrains and VSCode.
• Pricing: Free to use.
• User Feedback: Users appreciate its planning step resulting in better code output.

CodiumAI

• Features:
  • Offers accurate code suggestions, code explanation, automatic test generation, code behavior coverage, and supports multiple languages and IDEs.

DevoxxGenie

• Description: An IDEA plugin by JetBrains.
• Features: Supports Sonnet 3.5 and other models.
• Pricing: Free and open-source.

Viscous

• Features: Offers wall jumping, climbing, and other enhancements.
• User Feedback: Users are excited about the new features and enhancements.

Potential Future Developments

• Discussion: Users anticipate future advancements in AI coding tools that may revolutionize coding even further.
• Potential: Predictions include AI coding models with voice capabilities, screen viewing, and advanced coding abilities.

Personal Experiences

• User Views: Some users find AI coding tools helpful but acknowledge the importance of human oversight and careful application.
• Balance: A mixed opinion exists on the effectiveness and impact of AI tools in coding workflows.
• Growth: Tools like Cursor are showing promise in enhancing coding productivity, especially for repetitive tasks.

This summary highlights the features, pricing, and feedback from users of various AI coding assistant tools like Cursor, Supermaven, ChatGPT, Codebuddy, CodiumAI, and more. It also includes opinions on the future of AI in programming and personal experiences with these tools.