Summary of Reddit Comments on Sapir-Whorf Theory

Definition of Sapir-Whorf Theory:

• Linguistic Determinism: Language determines/influences our thoughts entirely.
• Weak Linguistic Determinism: Language influences, but does not entirely determine, our thoughts.

Arguments Against Sapir-Whorf Theory:

• Many linguists no longer take Sapir-Whorf seriously due to disproven claims and questionable methodologies.
• The theory is criticized for being racist, outdated, and focusing on exotic languages like Hopi.
• It's suggested that language changes due to thought, rather than the other way around.
• Euphemisms' failure to change connotations over time is used as evidence against the theory.

Limitations and Counterexamples:

• Limited vocabulary in a language (like in Toki Pona) may affect processing time but doesn't make concepts unthinkable.
• Example: Toki Pona designed to simplify thinking and promote positivity but not scientifically proven to do so.
• Counterexamples: Some languages lacking distinctions (e.g., blue vs. green) still allow their speakers to differentiate concepts.
• Influence of cultural norms and personal interpretations on language use and thought processes.

Other Points Raised:

• Consideration of Color Words: Differentiation of colors across languages as an example of linguistic relativity.
• Language Choices Influence: How wording can shape perceptions, illustrated through examples like "collateral damage" vs. "exploding innocents."
• Criticisms of Latin Logic: Disproving claims of Latin's logic superiority over English due to poetic and subjective elements in language.
• Cultural Context Influences Language: Instances of gender-neutral languages in sexist societies and their nuanced expressions.
• Toki Pona Experimentation: How the language design affects thought organization and expression.
• Variability in Language Use: People adapting language to suit their thought patterns, showcasing a bidirectional relationship.

Critiques of Sapir-Whorf Theory:

• Everett's view contrasts Sapir-Whorf, suggesting culture shapes language, not the other way around.

In conclusion, while there are mixed views on the Sapir-Whorf theory, criticisms suggest that language's impact on thought might be more nuanced than originally proposed, with cultural, societal, and personal factors playing significant roles in shaping both language and cognition.