Orchestration in PES:

• Frankie De Jong used as DM with deep-lying instructions

  • "He gets very available for the ball in midfield."
  • Highly involved in attacks.

• Pirlo

  • High off/def awareness
  • One version plays between the hole and as a creative playmaker while the other stays deeper to protect the defense line.

• Modric, Beckham, Kimmich, Kroos

  • Effective in a double pivot setup.
  • "Awesome no matter if you spam lofted through balls."
  • Orchestrators with various playing styles.

• Xabi Alonso

  • Ideal for an orchestrator when used with a hole player AMF.
  • Suitable for launching long balls.

• Albertini

  • Effective in both attack and defense.
  • Good at making runs and intercepting.

Pros and Cons of Orchestrators:

• Pros:

  • Useful for dictating the tempo of the game.
  • Make passes for others to run onto.
  • Various passing traits and skills.

• Cons:

  • Can be static and contribute less than box-to-box or destroyer types.
  • May struggle defensively in transitions.

Airflow as an Orchestrator:

• Airflow

  • Flexible and scalable engine if used correctly.
  • Can be misused, leading to issues.

• Custom Orchestrator

  • Writing one from scratch can be risky and time-consuming.
  • Hiring people with experience in existing tools is easier.

Pros and Cons of Custom Orchestrator:

• Pros:

  • Can be tailored to specific needs.
  • Could be a learning opportunity and look good on a CV.

• Cons:

  • May lead to technical debt and maintenance challenges.
  • Might not offer significant advantages over existing tools.

This summary covers the comparison and characteristics of orchestrators in PES and Airflow as an orchestration tool based on the Reddit comments provided.