Summary of Reddit Comments on "low code web":

Low-Code and No-Code Platforms

Low-code and no-code platforms are criticized for creating technical debt, having poor solutions, and limiting customization.
While they may be useful for simple tasks, once complexity increases, code still becomes necessary.
Employees using low-code/no-code tools can feel stagnant in their skills development and lack creative engagement.
Several comments suggest that these platforms are more about marketing and require coding principles to fully utilize.
A user shared a negative experience where using a low-code tool caused delays, confusion, and led to developer turnover.
Companies using these solutions often underestimate customization costs, leading to budget surprises.
While these platforms aim to lower IT costs, they may not always provide adequate solutions for complex projects.
Custom solutions are praised for offering tailored outcomes and efficiency, especially with the right engineer.
Low-code/no-code platforms could be more suitable for content pages with minimal logic, rather than web apps with complex requirements.

Some developers prefer traditional coding over low-code platforms due to issues like lack of control and readability.
Custom development is seen as a better option for tailored solutions and long-term maintainability.
Companies should ensure strong leadership emphasizing minimum viable products to save costs.
Issues with Firefox were discussed, including concerns about open-source culture, browser development, and design changes.
The importance of choosing the correct software licenses to prevent misuse and address issues like vampire companies bundling open-source work.
Suggestions include developers using licenses like GPL or AGPL to protect their work and to secure funding for maintenance.

Specific requests and offers for digital codes for various movies were discussed.
The conversation veered into the realm of building web applications with tools like Simian, Bubble, and WeWeb.
A variety of platforms were mentioned, including Firebase, Supabase, and Claude.ai for different types of application development.

The job market for developers and the dilemma of choosing between traditional coding and low-code/no-code platforms was a prevalent topic.
The importance of continuous skill development, product ownership roles, and understanding market demands featured in several comments.