Summary of Reddit Comments on "how much wood can a wood chuck chuck if a wood chuck could"

Comments on wood chucking:

A woodchuck would chuck as much wood as it could chuck if it could chuck wood.
Some suggested different amounts of wood chucked including 1 wood, just enough, 17 wood, half a cord, and 42.
A wood chuck could chuck no wood, chuck all it could, or chuck wood as much as a wood chuck could.
There were humorous variations on the query like "how many Lowes would Rob Lowe rob if Rob Lowe could rob Lowes" and "How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could Chuck Norris?"
The wood chuck question prompted creative spoken word responses with comedic and impressive delivery.
Some comments linked the query to other humorous "how much" queries involving groundhogs, coal trains, and woodchuck doctors curing disease.

A trebuchet was suggested as a wood chuck, capable of chucking about 1 tonne per hour.
A gif showed a woodchuck resembling a cat and referenced being stuck in a water duct.
Plans for a device to chuck wood chucks inspired the question of chucking woodchucks.

Many found out that a woodchuck is the same as a groundhog, not mythical.
Discussions arose about legal ways to control woodchuck populations and involved referencing other legal cases involving animals.

Users shared humorous or critical comments on the query, sparking varied responses.
Some comments used the woodchuck query humorously to address other topics like international politics and fictional scenarios.
Critique was offered on certain suggestions or legal advice provided in thread scenarios.

Various random and unrelated responses, memes, and partially deleted comments were scattered throughout the thread.
Conversations touched on wildlife living nearby, legal responsibilities with wild animals, and ethical considerations regarding wildlife removal.
Humorous quotes from movies and suggestions for comedic dialogues or Cameo requests added a light-hearted touch to the discussion.