English Course Certificate

Summary:

• Duolingo offers a proficiency test that can be used to prove English fluency, accepted by some Ivy League schools but completing Duolingo courses alone may not signify conversational skills.
• Completion of Duolingo courses does not necessarily equate to language proficiency according to user experiences.
• Schools generally accept a minimum Duolingo English test score as proof of proficiency.
• There is a distinction between completion of Duolingo courses and the Duolingo English proficiency test.
• Real-world experience and Face-to-face conversation are valued more than certifications for language proficiency.
• Users highlight the limitations of Duolingo for languages not Latin-based, suggesting Rosetta Stone as a more comprehensive option for language learning.
• Consensus: Duolingo may be useful for review and supplementary materials but might not be sufficient for language fluency.

Pros:

• Offers an English proficiency test accepted by some institutions.
• Provides a platform for language review and supplementary learning.

Cons:

• Completion of courses might not equate to language proficiency.
• Limitations for languages like Japanese and Mandarin.
• Real-world experience preferred over certifications.
• Rosetta Stone considered more comprehensive for language learning.
• Face-to-face conversation seen as a more reliable measure of language skills.