Summary of Reddit Comments on Email Clients

Thunderbird

• Description: Open-source email client by Mozilla.
• Pros: Open-source, reliable, free.
• Cons: Can take some tweaking to get it right.

Proton

• Description: Secure email service provider.
• Pros: Providers like Protonmail keep information safe, have excellent support.
• Cons: Some users mentioned issues like not being able to access via IMAP/SMTP.

Outlook

• Description: Email client by Microsoft.
• Pros: Familiar and commonly used in work settings.
• Cons: Not open-source, search feature issues, changes in interface disliked by some users.

FairEmail

• Description: FOSS email client available on F-Droid.
• Pros: Well-described options, worth the money for lifetime license.
• Cons: Some users found the interface too cluttered.

eM Client

• Description: Email client for Windows and Mac.
• Pros: Nice UI, stable, handles Outlook and Gmail, free for up to two accounts.
• Cons: Some users found issues with loading images in emails.

Mail Spring

• Description: Free and lightweight email client.
• Pros: Simple and open-source, AI features.
• Cons: Only available via web.

Superhuman

• Description: Expensive email client with advanced features.
• Pros: Crazy cool features, excellent for organization.
• Cons: Expensive, not free.

Other Mentioned Email Clients

• The Bat!: Paid email client keeping emails encrypted on the hard drive.
• Mutt: Mentioned as an alternative email client.
• Spark: Mentioned as a visually appealing email client.

Overall Consensus

• Users prefer open-source options like Thunderbird.
• Encouragement for using email clients that prioritize privacy like Proton and Tuta.
• Some users recommend client-specific solutions like Mimestream for Gmail and Apple Mail for Apple users.
• Some criticism of certain email clients for issues like non-open-source nature, cluttered interfaces, and AI features.
• Emphasis on the need for good system organization and shared drives for seamless employee handover and management of client data.