Summary of Reddit Comments on Crucial BX500

Overview of Crucial BX500 SSD:

• Budget SSD primarily suited for storage rather than as a primary OS drive.
• DRAM-less: Not recommended for use as a boot drive due to lack of DRAM cache.
• Speeds: Read/write speeds of 540/500.
• Capacity: Should not be filled over 70% of its capacity.

Pros:

• Suitable for mass storage or light desktop use.
• Affordable option for budget builds or upgrading old laptop drives.

Cons:

• Dramless: Slows down when over 75% full or under heavy workloads.
• Heat: May overheat during continuous write operations, reducing speeds to below 80MB/s.
• Not recommended for continuous write operations or high-stress applications.

Alternatives:

• Crucial MX500: Faster with DRAM cache, suitable for a higher-end SSD option.

Other Comments:

• The BX500 is listed as a TLC/QLC Storage SATA, Light SATA SSD for light-use cases.
• Not ideal for daily activities like installing/uninstalling games due to lack of DRAM cache.
• Consider Crucial P2 as a better alternative if an M.2 slot is available.
• Users have used it for game storage and daily use without major issues.

Remember that the Crucial BX500 is a budget option with limitations, making it suitable for specific use cases with awareness of its drawbacks. If looking for better performance and reliability, consider alternatives like the Crucial MX500.