Summary of Reddit Comments on "Chat GPT Jailbreak Prompts"

ChatGPT Usage and Effectiveness

• A user mentions providing specific and advanced instructions can yield better responses. They modified their approach by adjusting the session config with an Excel spreadsheet for improved research-based responses.
• One user found that despite the fancy setup, ChatGPT did not provide a better response.
• Context and detailed instructions matter more than assigned roles for effective responses.
• Mention of using a "prompts engine" like Prompt Engine for generating prompts without mentioning roles.
• Another user mentions using a progression from simple to complex questions when interacting with ChatGPT.
• A query about the difference between role mention and talking to GPT results in detailed suggestions on how to enhance responses for law-related tasks.
• Acknowledgment for thorough process description and example sharing for improved community knowledge.
• Indication that certain actions might be taking place behind the scenes regarding persona prompting.
• Provided recommendations for further research exploration and a guide for those new to using ChatGPT.
• Question about storing personas and suggestions for strategies like saving them in separate chats or providing names for individual contexts.
• Commendation on generous contribution and suggestion of sharing content on other platforms.
• Personal experience shared on effectively interacting with ChatGPT to receive positive outcomes.

Critiques and Experiences with ChatGPT and Related Tools

• User expresses skepticism and lack of beneficial outcome from using a prefabricated jailbreak.
• Criticism of the perceived lack of usefulness and substance in a prolonged detailed post on ChatGPT predictions.
• Discussion on the limitations and challenges faced when utilizing ChatGPT for financial predictions.
• Mention of potential biases and shortcomings in ChatGPT's output due to human text training data.
• Mention of various AI tools like Bard, Arro.ai, and LMStudio for use in writing tasks and limitations of each.
• Diverging experiences and opinions on the functionality and effectiveness of ChatGPT, with some users finding success and others encountering challenges.
• Comments on the evolving user proficiency with AI tools and changing expectations over time.
• Optimization tips provided for improving ChatGPT interactions, including using a mix of models and custom prompts.
• Dissatisfaction with the purported decline in ChatGPT performance and nostalgia for earlier versions and novelty of experience.

Response to ChatGPT and Alternative Tools

• Discontent with the perceived decrease in ChatGPT's capabilities and accuracy.
• Differing opinions on ChatGPT's utility and capabilities for various tasks like coding, proofreading, and translation.
• Mention of challenges faced with alternative AI tools like Claude 3 and the limitations in proofreading capabilities.
• Discussion on the impacts of computation resource allocation on ChatGPT performance.
• Suggestion to utilize one's own GPT model with custom instructions for improved results.
• Acknowledgment of various metrics favoring GPT-4 over older versions and skepticism regarding contrasting experiences.
• Query on potential improvements for utilizing Bing and ChatGPT via an API or app.
• Questioning the perceived decline in ChatGPT's quality and effectiveness.
• Discussion on varying experiences and effectiveness when using ChatGPT based on specific tasks and use cases.

This summary encompasses a range of insights, critiques, experiences, and discussions around utilizing ChatGPT, exploring alternative AI tools, and navigating challenges in AI interaction and effectiveness.