Alternatives to Anthropics Artefacts for Running Live Code

Here is a summary of various Reddit comments related to the query about alternatives to Anthropics Artefacts for running live code:

• Zapit Wallet is suggested as an alternative for peer-to-peer trading, but it is noted that it is not entirely non-custodial due to the need for individuals to solve disputes.

  • Pros: Allows for peer-to-peer trading.
  • Cons: Not entirely non-custodial, potentially vulnerable to fraudsters.

• The Permissionless Software Foundation is mentioned, with a member of the foundation having recreated a contract similar to the one developed by LocalCryptos, integrating it into a gift card exchange website.

  • Pros: Offers solutions for integrating contract scripts.
  • Cons: Unclear if fully integrated across various platforms.

• Suggestions are made for using old school door-to-door sales techniques to pitch ideas directly to LocalBitcoins.com for free in exchange for control or a percentage.

  • Pros: Direct approach to pitch ideas.
  • Cons: No guarantee of success or acceptance.

• Discussion about the potential dangers of ComfyUI Manager malware and the need for caution when dealing with such threats.

  • Pros: Raises awareness about cybersecurity issues.
  • Cons: Potential risks and security vulnerabilities.

• Comments about various AI advancements and the impact on jobs, including concerns about AI replacing human roles in various industries.

  • Pros: Advancements in AI technologies.
  • Cons: Potential job displacement.

• Sonnet 3.5 API is mentioned as a possible alternative for accessing AI models, offering cost-effective solutions for users.

  • Pros: Cost-effective access to AI models.
  • Cons: Limitations on usage.

In summary, the responses from Reddit users cover a range of topics related to alternative options for various products and technologies, providing insights into cost-effectiveness, security concerns, job implications, and potential advancements in the AI industry.